HeyHippocrates Intensive Care
Specialist-authored · every answer cited

A cited second opinion, at the speed of the unit.

Clinical decision support for intensivists that reasons like a trusted colleague, grounded only in champion-authored, cited knowledge. Ask the question; get the answer, the decision rule, and what's missing.

1 free month + 50% off 3 months · Founding Physician

Generic AI guesses. At the bedside, that's not good enough.

A large language model will answer any critical-care question with total confidence, and no idea whether it's right. On a night shift, slow isn't an option. What you actually want is a colleague who knows the evidence cold, tells you the decision rule, and admits what they'd need to know to be sure.

Hallucination you can't auditConfident answers with invented numbers. Fine for a blog, dangerous on a ventilator or a pressor.
Decisions can't wait for a lit searchWhen the MAP is dropping, you need the rule now, not ten tabs later.
No specialty in the loopGeneral tools don't reason like an intensivist. The sickest patients have the least margin.

How it works

A thinking partner, not a search box. Three steps, the way you'd use a colleague.

Step 1

Ask, like you'd ask a colleague

Type or speak a real clinical question, like "septic shock, MAP 58 on norepinephrine — what is next?" No rigid syntax.

Step 2

Get a cited, reasoned answer

A specialist-grade answer grounded only in red-penned knowledge, with the decision rule and the specific data that would sharpen it.

Step 3

Decide with confidence

You stay the decision-maker. It carries the evidence and the caveats, so the call is yours: faster, and better defended.

The mechanism, shown — not claimed.

Real critical-care questions, answered in the format our knowledge base speaks: answer → decision rule → what's missing → source.

Septic shock — which vasopressor, and when to add a second?

Norepinephrine is first-line. If the MAP stays below 65 despite up-titration, add vasopressin at a fixed 0.03 U/min rather than pushing norepinephrine to very high doses, and consider hydrocortisone in refractory shock.Surviving Sepsis

Decision ruleTarget a MAP ≥65; escalate by adding a second agent with a complementary mechanism, and reassess perfusion, not just the number.

Missing data: Current MAP and doses, lactate and perfusion, fluid-responsiveness, and echo findings change the next step.

Grounded in specialist-authored, cited knowledge — reviewed by the intensive-care champion.

ARDS — how should the ventilator be set?

Use lung-protective ventilation: tidal volume 4–6 mL/kg of predicted body weight, plateau pressure under 30 with driving pressure as low as possible, PEEP paired to FiO₂, and prone positioning for moderate-to-severe ARDS (P/F < 150).ARDSNet / guidelines

Decision ruleProtect the lung first — low tidal volume by predicted body weight. Accept permissive hypercapnia and prone early when the P/F is low.

Missing data: P/F ratio, plateau and driving pressure, compliance, and hemodynamics change the settings.

Cited, specialist-reviewed — not a generic web summary.

Why not just use OpenEvidence or ChatGPT?

All three answer questions. Only one is a specialist colleague whose every claim you can trace.

 
HeyHippocrates
OpenEvidence
ChatGPT
Specialist reasoning per field
A soul per specialty
Generalist
Generalist
Grounded in champion-authored, cited knowledge
Red-penned
Literature
Open web
States the decision rule + what's missing
Always
Sometimes
Rarely
Voice + text, physician-verified only
Yes
Partial
No

What you get

A colleague in your pocketVoice or text, at the desk or between cases: the specialist you'd want to curbside, always available.
The decision rule, made explicitNot just an answer, but the logic behind it, so you can defend the call and teach from it.
Safety & missing-data flagsIt tells you what it doesn't know and what would change the answer. The opposite of false confidence.
Every claim is traceableAnswers are grounded in cited, specialist-reviewed knowledge — never invented, never generic web.
30+ specialties, one brainNeurosurgery first, then cardiology, oncology, emergency, intensive care, and beyond.
Built for physicians onlyVerified-physician access and CDS intended-use, with no patient-facing claims or medical-device pretense.
Founding Physician

Be one of the first intensivists in.

The waitlist isn't a marketing list. It's a founding cohort. Members shape the specialty, get in before anyone else, and lock the founding price for good.

  • 1 free month — the whole product, no card.
  • 50% off the first 3 paid months.
  • A numbered Founding Physician badge.
  • First say on what intensive care gets next.
Claim your place

Join the intensive care waitlist

Leave your name and work email. We'll reach out the moment intensive care opens — with your Founding Physician offer.

One email at launch. No spam, ever.

Questions physicians ask

No. It's a physician-facing clinical decision-support companion — a thinking partner for your reasoning. It does not diagnose, does not treat, and gives no patient-facing advice. The clinical decision always stays with you.

Verified physicians only. Each specialty is led by a champion physician who red-penned its knowledge base, and 30+ specialties are built. Access is gated to licensed physicians.

Every answer is grounded only in champion-authored, cited knowledge — traceable, not hallucinated. It reasons like a colleague in your specialty, and always states the decision rule plus what data is missing, instead of a confident guess.

30+ specialties are built, each with its own specialist "soul" and cited knowledge base. Neurosurgery leads; cardiology, clinical oncology, emergency medicine and intensive care follow.

It's being built now. Waitlist members get first access and the Founding Physician offer: one free month plus 50% off the first three months, and a numbered founding badge.

This page collects only your name and email, for launch contact. In the product, clinical inputs are de-identified on-device; no patient data is stored on this marketing site.