HeyHippocrates All specialties
Psychiatry · specialist-authored · every answer cited

Depression, bipolar, psychosis, suicide risk — a colleague who cites every call.

Clinical decision support that reasons like a psychiatrist: screen for bipolarity before an antidepressant, choose and escalate depression treatment, start the antipsychotic in first-episode psychosis, and run a structured suicide risk assessment — with the decision rule and exactly what would change it. Built for verified physicians.

1 free month + 50% off 3 months · Founding Psychiatrist

Watch it think — in psychiatry.

Two real psychiatry questions, each reasoned the way HeyHippocrates answers: the skills fire, the answer is cited, the decision rule is explicit, and what's missing is flagged. Scroll to each.

HeyHippocratesPsychiatry · Bipolar screen

Depression with a past episode of a decreased need for sleep, racing thoughts and overspending — before I start an SSRI?

Reasoningred-flag check differential guideline lookup citation-verify

Screen for bipolarity before prescribing any antidepressant. A past episode of decreased need for sleep, racing thoughts, grandiosity and impulsive spending points to hypomania or mania, which reframes this as bipolar depression. An unopposed antidepressant can precipitate a manic switch or rapid cycling, so treat bipolar depression with a mood stabilizer or an approved agent — quetiapine, lurasidone, cariprazine or lamotrigine — rather than antidepressant monotherapy. Confirm the history with a collateral and a tool such as the MDQ.

screen bipolar first no antidepressant monotherapy verified

Decision ruleDepression + any past hypomania or mania → bipolar; screen before an antidepressant (MDQ + collateral); treat bipolar depression with a mood stabilizer or approved agent (quetiapine/lurasidone/cariprazine/lamotrigine), not antidepressant monotherapy.

Not established from this alone — the manic history, the collateral and the course change the diagnosis and the drug.

Grounded in champion-authored, cited knowledge — validated by champion physicians.
HeyHippocratesPsychiatry · Suicide risk

Passive death wishes after a recent loss, with access to firearms at home — the assessment?

Reasoningred-flag check risk-stratify guideline lookup citation-verify

Do a structured suicide risk assessment: ask directly and specifically about ideation, plan, intent, access to means and prior attempts, and weigh protective factors — asking does not plant the idea. Build a collaborative safety plan, and make means restriction concrete, above all the firearms. Decide the level of care from the risk: hospitalize when there is intent or a plan with available means and the person cannot stay safe, and arrange close follow-up otherwise.

ask directly restrict means verified

Decision ruleStructured assessment (ideation, plan, intent, means, prior attempts, protective factors — e.g. C-SSRS); asking does not increase risk; collaborative safety plan + means restriction (firearms); hospitalize for intent/plan/means with inability to stay safe.

Not established from this alone — the intent, the plan, the means and the protective factors change the level of care.

Grounded in champion-authored, cited knowledge — validated by champion physicians.

Illustrative simulations. The physician always decides.

The answers psychiatrists actually look up.

The exact questions your field searches for — answered in the format the knowledge base speaks: the answer, the decision rule, what's missing, and the source.

Major depression — first-line treatment and what if it fails?

Confirm the diagnosis and severity, screen for bipolarity and suicide risk, then start an SSRI or SNRI as first-line, paired with psychotherapy, and reassess in two to four weeks. If there is no response at an adequate dose and duration, optimize the dose, then switch agent or augment — with an atypical antipsychotic, lithium or bupropion. For treatment-resistant depression, consider esketamine or ECT, which remains the most effective option for severe or psychotic depression.APA

Decision ruleConfirm + screen bipolar/suicide → SSRI/SNRI + psychotherapy; reassess 2–4 weeks; no response → optimize dose, then switch or augment (atypical/lithium/bupropion); treatment-resistant → esketamine or ECT.

Missing data: the severity, the bipolar screen and prior trials change the choice.

Cited, specialist-reviewed — not a generic web summary.

Bipolar disorder — how do I recognize and treat it?

Diagnose from a history of a manic or hypomanic episode, not depression alone, and always screen a depressed patient for past highs before treating. For acute mania, use lithium, valproate or an antipsychotic, alone or combined; for bipolar depression, use quetiapine, lurasidone, cariprazine or lamotrigine and avoid antidepressant monotherapy. Lithium anchors long-term maintenance and reduces suicide risk. Monitor levels, thyroid and renal function.APA · bipolar

Decision ruleDiagnose on manic/hypomanic history; acute mania → lithium/valproate/antipsychotic; bipolar depression → quetiapine/lurasidone/cariprazine/lamotrigine, not antidepressant alone; lithium for maintenance + suicide reduction; monitor levels/thyroid/renal.

Missing data: the episode type, the history and the comorbidity change the medication.

Cited, specialist-reviewed — not a generic web summary.

First-episode psychosis — the initial management?

Work up a first psychotic episode to exclude substance-induced and medical causes, then start a single antipsychotic at the lowest effective dose, choosing by the side-effect profile rather than presumed superiority — except clozapine, reserved for treatment resistance. Combine medication with coordinated specialty care, family involvement and psychosocial support, which improve outcomes in early psychosis. Monitor metabolic parameters and movement disorders from the start.APA · schizophrenia

Decision ruleExclude substance/medical causes → one antipsychotic at lowest effective dose (choose by side-effects); coordinated specialty care + psychosocial support; clozapine for treatment resistance; monitor metabolic + extrapyramidal effects.

Missing data: the cause, the side-effect profile and the response change the agent.

Cited, specialist-reviewed — not a generic web summary.

Suicide risk — how do I assess and manage it?

Assess risk structurally — ideation, plan, intent, access to means, prior attempts and acute stressors, balanced against protective factors — using a tool such as the Columbia scale, and ask directly, because asking does not increase risk. Manage with collaborative safety planning and concrete means restriction, especially of firearms and lethal medication. Match the level of care to the risk, hospitalizing when intent, a plan and available means combine with an inability to stay safe.APA · suicide

Decision ruleStructured assessment (ideation/plan/intent/means/prior attempts/stressors vs protective factors; C-SSRS); ask directly; safety plan + means restriction; hospitalize for intent + plan + means + inability to stay safe.

Missing data: the intent, the plan, the means access and the supports change the disposition.

Cited, specialist-reviewed — not a generic web summary.

What it knows in psychiatry

Your whole practice, one specialist brain — grounded in champion-authored, cited knowledge.

Mood disordersDepression, bipolar and the treatment ladder.
Anxiety & traumaGAD, panic, OCD and PTSD.
PsychosisSchizophrenia and the antipsychotic.
Suicide & safetyRisk assessment and safety planning.
Substance useScreening, withdrawal and medication-assisted treatment.
Medication emergenciesSerotonin syndrome, NMS and lithium toxicity.
BasicThe full psychiatry scope

A generalist psychiatry colleague across mood disorders, anxiety and trauma, psychosis, suicide risk, substance use and medication emergencies — cited, non-directive, always with the decision rule.

ProSub-specialty depth

Deep specialist agents for mood and anxiety disorders, psychotic disorders, addiction psychiatry and child and adolescent psychiatry — each its own soul and knowledge base — plus your own uploaded materials.

Why not just use OpenEvidence or ChatGPT?

From the bipolar screen to the suicide risk call the margin is thin. Only one of these reasons like a psychiatry colleague whose every claim you can trace.

 
HeyHippocrates
OpenEvidence
ChatGPT
Psychiatry reasoning & frameworks (the bipolar screen, the treatment ladders, structured risk assessment)
Built in
Generalist
Generalist
Grounded in champion-authored, cited knowledge
Validated
Literature
Open web
States the decision rule + what's missing
Always
Sometimes
Rarely
Founding Psychiatrist

Be one of the first psychiatrists in.

The waitlist is a founding cohort. Members shape the psychiatry build, get in before anyone else, and lock the founding price for good.

  • 1 free month — the whole product, no card.
  • 50% off the first 3 paid months.
  • A numbered Founding Psychiatrist badge.
  • First say on what psychiatry gets next.
Claim your place

Join the psychiatry waitlist

Leave your name and work email. We'll reach out the moment psychiatry opens — with your Founding Psychiatrist offer.

One email at launch. No spam, ever.

Questions psychiatrists ask

It reasons in the frameworks you use — the bipolar screen, the depression treatment ladder, the antipsychotic choice and structured suicide risk assessment — and always shows the reasoning, the decision rule and what would change it. The decision always stays your call.

Both. Residents use it to pressure-test a plan and learn the decision rule; attendings use it as a fast, cited second opinion in clinic and on consults. Access is gated to verified physicians.

Mood and anxiety disorders, psychotic disorders, addiction psychiatry and child and adolescent psychiatry each have their own deep specialist agent on the Pro plan, on top of the full psychiatry scope on Basic.

No. It is physician-facing clinical decision support — a cited thinking partner. It does not diagnose, does not treat, and gives no patient-facing advice. The decision always stays with you.

Every answer is grounded only in champion-authored, cited psychiatry knowledge — traceable, not hallucinated — and always states the decision rule plus what data is missing, instead of a confident guess.